<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scripting engines just got a whole lot faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web-graphics.com/2008/09/02/scripting-engines-just-got-a-whole-lot-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web-graphics.com/2008/09/02/scripting-engines-just-got-a-whole-lot-faster/</link>
	<description>Web development concerns, usually revolving around implimentation of designs into graphics, CSS, and HTML.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:10:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: app</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2008/09/02/scripting-engines-just-got-a-whole-lot-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-41925</link>
		<dc:creator>app</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/?p=65#comment-41925</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait till TraceMonkey is ready for prime time and makes its way into the official version of K-Meleon.

Us owners of old slow PC&#039;s could really use that speed boost, and currently K-Meleon is the only browser many of us can run. 

The current trend on the internet to overscript pages is killing a lot of us. Hopefully TraceMonkey will fix that and allow us to use sites we currently can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait till TraceMonkey is ready for prime time and makes its way into the official version of K-Meleon.</p>
<p>Us owners of old slow PC&#8217;s could really use that speed boost, and currently K-Meleon is the only browser many of us can run. </p>
<p>The current trend on the internet to overscript pages is killing a lot of us. Hopefully TraceMonkey will fix that and allow us to use sites we currently can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liorean</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2008/09/02/scripting-engines-just-got-a-whole-lot-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-41091</link>
		<dc:creator>liorean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/?p=65#comment-41091</guid>
		<description>Brendan: Is this fix in a nightly/hourly build that I could test yet?

(Edit: Oh, just found an hourly with the bug fixed and ran it through the benchmark. Very nice results, I must say!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendan: Is this fix in a nightly/hourly build that I could test yet?</p>
<p>(Edit: Oh, just found an hourly with the bug fixed and ran it through the benchmark. Very nice results, I must say!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Eich</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2008/09/02/scripting-engines-just-got-a-whole-lot-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-41090</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Eich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/?p=65#comment-41090</guid>
		<description>The bug afflicting date-format-tofte.js has been fixed. See

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453361

TraceMonkey is still evolving; we still do not complete trace recordings in common benchmarks due to unfinished work, which we are busy pursuing all the time. It&#039;s silly at this stage (9 or so weeks) to count it as &quot;done&quot;. V8 has obviously been in the works a while, and it&#039;s a good piece of engineering. But the race goes on.

/be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bug afflicting date-format-tofte.js has been fixed. See</p>
<p><a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453361" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453361</a></p>
<p>TraceMonkey is still evolving; we still do not complete trace recordings in common benchmarks due to unfinished work, which we are busy pursuing all the time. It&#8217;s silly at this stage (9 or so weeks) to count it as &#8220;done&#8221;. V8 has obviously been in the works a while, and it&#8217;s a good piece of engineering. But the race goes on.</p>
<p>/be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2008/09/02/scripting-engines-just-got-a-whole-lot-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-41083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/?p=65#comment-41083</guid>
		<description>I found a few other benchmark suites too and I must say, I&#039;m pretty much sold on the performance boost V8 delivers. Very impressive. Especially the 4x speed boost against FF3 in Mozilla&#039;s own test :)

http://jrm.cc/articles/717-google-chrome-javascript-benchmarks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a few other benchmark suites too and I must say, I&#8217;m pretty much sold on the performance boost V8 delivers. Very impressive. Especially the 4x speed boost against FF3 in Mozilla&#8217;s own test :)</p>
<p><a href="http://jrm.cc/articles/717-google-chrome-javascript-benchmarks" rel="nofollow">http://jrm.cc/articles/717-google-chrome-javascript-benchmarks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
