Comments on: Not a doubt in my mind http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/ Web development concerns, usually revolving around implimentation of designs into graphics, CSS, and HTML. Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:24:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Music-Band http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-17065 Music-Band Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:14:04 +0000 http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-17065 Hey I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool. Currently im running and adult site:<a href="http://www.vnvnation.biz/queries.html" rel="nofollow">Reachton</a> k, just want to say hi :) Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something. Hey

I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool.
Currently im running and adult site:Reachton
k, just want to say hi :)
Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something.

]]> By: crestosssa http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-16934 crestosssa Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:15:35 +0000 http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-16934 Hey I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool. Currently im running and adult site:<a href="http://www.reachton.com" rel="nofollow">Reachton</a> k, just want to say hi :) Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something. Hey

I was surfing the web and i saw this site, pretty cool.
Currently im running and adult site:Reachton
k, just want to say hi :)
Can i link you from my site? im looking for quality content like yours. If no let me know if i can add u in exchange for a montly fee or something.

]]> By: jack http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-10823 jack Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:14:47 +0000 http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-10823 first of all let me tell that u do not have need to worry about it bcs their are different kinds of auther which they have been published an innumeriable books if u want to my help so i am ready to help you on jave scripts ans some thing like programming on flash and etc. first of all let me tell that u do not have need to worry about it bcs their are different kinds of auther which they have been published an innumeriable books if u want to my help so i am ready to help you on jave scripts ans some thing like programming on flash and etc.

]]> By: Shawn Oster http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-7374 Shawn Oster Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:37:05 +0000 http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-7374 I agree with you in theory. One point in Steven Yegge's original post is that he puts the NBL right up against C, C++ and C# and other "native" languages and unless there is something coming that I don't know about (highly likely) then I only see ECMAScript 4 as of value for the browser-based app world. I still do a lot of native language work, by which I mean anything that compiles down to an application that looks and feels 100% native to that OS and hooks into the OS's message loop. While I love browser-based apps I still get more requests for apps that can function behind ever more restricted firewalls. Unless ECMAScript 4 can do that it's only going to be the NBL for scripting and the browser and won't be taking C and C++'s throne anytime soon. So in a way while ECMAScript 4 *could* be the NBL it's not going to get that chance unless there is a very strong IDE behind it as well as a UI framework for it that let's developers crank out native apps. Ruby existed long before Rails but it was only the framework that really made it popular. C# is a very tidy language but without .NET and the ASP.NET/Postback model most wouldn't see the need. Unless there is a killer framework or IDE ECMAScript 4 is going to stay inside the browser-box, why switch to ECMAScript 4 unless you have some way to leverage it? Random thought, I suppose the right combination of XAML + ECMAScript 4 could actually be a killer combo. I agree with you in theory. One point in Steven Yegge’s original post is that he puts the NBL right up against C, C++ and C# and other “native” languages and unless there is something coming that I don’t know about (highly likely) then I only see ECMAScript 4 as of value for the browser-based app world.

I still do a lot of native language work, by which I mean anything that compiles down to an application that looks and feels 100% native to that OS and hooks into the OS’s message loop. While I love browser-based apps I still get more requests for apps that can function behind ever more restricted firewalls. Unless ECMAScript 4 can do that it’s only going to be the NBL for scripting and the browser and won’t be taking C and C++’s throne anytime soon.

So in a way while ECMAScript 4 *could* be the NBL it’s not going to get that chance unless there is a very strong IDE behind it as well as a UI framework for it that let’s developers crank out native apps. Ruby existed long before Rails but it was only the framework that really made it popular. C# is a very tidy language but without .NET and the ASP.NET/Postback model most wouldn’t see the need. Unless there is a killer framework or IDE ECMAScript 4 is going to stay inside the browser-box, why switch to ECMAScript 4 unless you have some way to leverage it?

Random thought, I suppose the right combination of XAML + ECMAScript 4 could actually be a killer combo.

]]> By: John A. Davis http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-7344 John A. Davis Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:13:27 +0000 http://web-graphics.com/2007/02/15/not-a-doubt-in-my-mind/#comment-7344 too much blah blah. show us an example. too much blah blah. show us an example.

]]>