<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting dressed slowly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/</link>
	<description>Web development concerns, usually revolving around implimentation of designs into graphics, CSS, and HTML.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:10:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: erlmymsmgn</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-14281</link>
		<dc:creator>erlmymsmgn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-14281</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! uwhnfwndqsa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! uwhnfwndqsa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loki</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-5465</link>
		<dc:creator>loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-5465</guid>
		<description>I too am creating a new site and have decided on giving the One True Layout a try. Iâ€™m looking forward to hearing how it all works out for youâ€¦ One True Layout as well as the transition to Word Press.
http:///torrentmania.info emule
I did want to ask, are you saying youâ€™re using emâ€™s as your base unit? I ended up using percentages for my layout boxes and Iâ€™m now wondering if that was the best decision for a fluid layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am creating a new site and have decided on giving the One True Layout a try. Iâ€™m looking forward to hearing how it all works out for youâ€¦ One True Layout as well as the transition to Word Press.<br />
<a href="http:///torrentmania.info" rel="nofollow">http:///torrentmania.info</a> emule<br />
I did want to ask, are you saying youâ€™re using emâ€™s as your base unit? I ended up using percentages for my layout boxes and Iâ€™m now wondering if that was the best decision for a fluid layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Steiner</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>@Dan: Thats really interesting, I wouldn&#039;t have thought that starting from a static template would be easier with WP. Then again, starting with the [basic theme](http://www.visual-assault.org/wpTheme_basic/index.html) is really almost like starting with nothing (in that it&#039;s stripped down to the core).

@Todd: Hey I&#039;m sorry to not have met you at An Event Apart either. Yeah I&#039;m even more hyped on the One True Layout than ever now that I&#039;ve started using it here. It&#039;s easier than it seems when you read about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan: Thats really interesting, I wouldn&#8217;t have thought that starting from a static template would be easier with WP. Then again, starting with the [basic theme](http://www.visual-assault.org/wpTheme_basic/index.html) is really almost like starting with nothing (in that it&#8217;s stripped down to the core).</p>
<p>@Todd: Hey I&#8217;m sorry to not have met you at An Event Apart either. Yeah I&#8217;m even more hyped on the One True Layout than ever now that I&#8217;ve started using it here. It&#8217;s easier than it seems when you read about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Lambert</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hi Nate... I too am in the midst of re-designing my own site using the One True Layout techniques (although my re-design is going on behind a curtain - not all of us are as brave - hehehe). 

Like you, It took Eric&#039;s presentation in order for the technique to &quot;jive&quot; with me. (I am sorry that we did not meet at AEA - I would have liked to have gotten to meet you - having read your site for awhile now)

I have layed out my site using the layout style of OTL, but I am not going to have to use the negative margins in my case. So, my site will be layed out for it&#039;s future use and not in the new re-design. I can definitely see the flexibility it will afford though!

Anyways, on with the show... I am eager to see where you go with your site...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nate&#8230; I too am in the midst of re-designing my own site using the One True Layout techniques (although my re-design is going on behind a curtain &#8211; not all of us are as brave &#8211; hehehe). </p>
<p>Like you, It took Eric&#8217;s presentation in order for the technique to &#8220;jive&#8221; with me. (I am sorry that we did not meet at AEA &#8211; I would have liked to have gotten to meet you &#8211; having read your site for awhile now)</p>
<p>I have layed out my site using the layout style of OTL, but I am not going to have to use the negative margins in my case. So, my site will be layed out for it&#8217;s future use and not in the new re-design. I can definitely see the flexibility it will afford though!</p>
<p>Anyways, on with the show&#8230; I am eager to see where you go with your site&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really keen to see what this grows into. &#039;Organic&#039; websites are an interesting thing to watch! Using this method of building up a site can really show what&#039;s goin on in the head of the person building it! It&#039;s a fantastic way to pick up new techniques and to learn some things you may not have had the opportunity to learn had you designed and built everything up front.

I&#039;m also using Wordpress. I actually found it easier to contruct a flat site and then add the WP code, gradually replacing the static content. I found that trying to mash templates together for what I wanted turned out to be a mess; it was better for me to go from ground up without templates. That could just be an &quot;I don&#039;t know what I&#039;m doing with WP yet&quot; thing though. ;)


I&#039;m keeping an eye out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really keen to see what this grows into. &#8216;Organic&#8217; websites are an interesting thing to watch! Using this method of building up a site can really show what&#8217;s goin on in the head of the person building it! It&#8217;s a fantastic way to pick up new techniques and to learn some things you may not have had the opportunity to learn had you designed and built everything up front.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also using Wordpress. I actually found it easier to contruct a flat site and then add the WP code, gradually replacing the static content. I found that trying to mash templates together for what I wanted turned out to be a mess; it was better for me to go from ground up without templates. That could just be an &#8220;I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m doing with WP yet&#8221; thing though. ;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m keeping an eye out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Steiner</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Well in terms of WordPress, I first tried using it on the [twinsparc](http://twinsparc.com) site. Honestly it was a bit painful to figure out how to hack up the templates to work the way we wanted. After that, we used it for a client in a more traditional blog type setup and it went a bit smoother.  So far on Web-Graphics it&#039;s been a breeze, partially because I&#039;m familiar with WordPress now, and partially because it&#039;s completely blogish.

Ems are a neat way to size your layout (meaning specify layout boxes with em width) because when a user resizes the font size, the entire layout scales with it (sort of like Opera&#039;s zoom sizing). I&#039;m not sure how this all plays into fluid layouts, mostly because I just really not a fan of fluid layouts - but that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in terms of WordPress, I first tried using it on the [twinsparc](http://twinsparc.com) site. Honestly it was a bit painful to figure out how to hack up the templates to work the way we wanted. After that, we used it for a client in a more traditional blog type setup and it went a bit smoother.  So far on Web-Graphics it&#8217;s been a breeze, partially because I&#8217;m familiar with WordPress now, and partially because it&#8217;s completely blogish.</p>
<p>Ems are a neat way to size your layout (meaning specify layout boxes with em width) because when a user resizes the font size, the entire layout scales with it (sort of like Opera&#8217;s zoom sizing). I&#8217;m not sure how this all plays into fluid layouts, mostly because I just really not a fan of fluid layouts &#8211; but that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I too am creating a new site and have decided on giving the One True Layout a try. I&#039;m looking forward to hearing how it all works out for youâ€¦ One True Layout as well as the transition to Word Press.

I did want to ask, are you saying you&#039;re using em&#039;s as your base unit? I ended up using percentages for my layout boxes and I&#039;m now wondering if that was the best decision for a fluid layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am creating a new site and have decided on giving the One True Layout a try. I&#8217;m looking forward to hearing how it all works out for youâ€¦ One True Layout as well as the transition to Word Press.</p>
<p>I did want to ask, are you saying you&#8217;re using em&#8217;s as your base unit? I ended up using percentages for my layout boxes and I&#8217;m now wondering if that was the best decision for a fluid layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Steiner</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the positive feedback guys. Nate - thats a good question. I think we&#039;ll have to see what happens and use our best judgement. I&#039;m inclined to say we won&#039;t be swayed by popular opinion, but frankly if there&#039;s good rationale, we&#039;re likely to follow suit. 
Anyways, thanks again for the kind words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the positive feedback guys. Nate &#8211; thats a good question. I think we&#8217;ll have to see what happens and use our best judgement. I&#8217;m inclined to say we won&#8217;t be swayed by popular opinion, but frankly if there&#8217;s good rationale, we&#8217;re likely to follow suit.<br />
Anyways, thanks again for the kind words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Rutman</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Rutman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Nate,

I love the idea for a live redesign!  It will be fun to watch the process.  It will also be fun to see how community-swayed you guys are (i.e. if you make a piece of the design live and people don&#039;t like it, what will you do?).  I&#039;m sad to see the old layout go, but I&#039;m anticipating the new web-graphics.com.

-Nate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate,</p>
<p>I love the idea for a live redesign!  It will be fun to watch the process.  It will also be fun to see how community-swayed you guys are (i.e. if you make a piece of the design live and people don&#8217;t like it, what will you do?).  I&#8217;m sad to see the old layout go, but I&#8217;m anticipating the new web-graphics.com.</p>
<p>-Nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-graphics.com/2006/04/06/rework/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Nate, I&#039;m most interested in seeing how the switch goes.  I&#039;ve been sitting on MoveableType for too long, ignoring the mounting problems.  I toyed once with TextPattern and WordPress, but didn&#039;t go any further.  It&#039;ll be neat to see how it goes for you, see if it can get my off my butt as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, I&#8217;m most interested in seeing how the switch goes.  I&#8217;ve been sitting on MoveableType for too long, ignoring the mounting problems.  I toyed once with TextPattern and WordPress, but didn&#8217;t go any further.  It&#8217;ll be neat to see how it goes for you, see if it can get my off my butt as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
